Reviews
Facebook
Links
Downloads
History
Contacts
Home
Best viewed with
IE8 or newer @
1024x768 or
larger. Copyright
© 1997-2012 by
Club Overclocker
All rights reserved.
Legal Stuff

Product Application:

Gaming Graphics Card
Product Provided by: Sapphire

Available at:

Newegg

Estimated Online Price:

$549

Availability:

Now

Review by:

Joe

Edited by:

Scott

Review date:

08/12/2008

Crucial System Scanner
 

Testing:

To run the 4870X2 through its paces, we are going to run a plethora of benchmarks.  Now, GPU benchmarks generally fall into three different classes, all with different strengths and weaknesses:

Synthetic: These benchmarks are generally not tied to any specific game, but are generally designed to emulate what gaming can be like.  If the benchmark is universally accepted, it can be used as a rough guideline as to performance.  The downside is they are a poor judge for any specific game title.

Timedemos:  Time demos are usually pre-recorded sequences within the game that are replayed, and the performance measured.  The advantage of time demos are that runs are exact every time, and should give a good measure of a games performance.  The disadvantage is that not everyone owns all the games.

In Game Frame Counting:  In game frame counting usually involves the tester playing the game, and using a tool like FRAPs to capture the frame rate.  The advantage here is that actual game play is being used, the disadvantage is that it is hard to duplicate the exact same sequence more than once. 

In order to paint the most complete performance picture, we will be using all three methods.  And in order to make things interesting, we are going to compare the X2 to the reigning champ: a factory overclocked MSI GTX-280, all on the following test bench, using Vista SP1:   

CPU: Q6600 @ 3.54GHz, 1.35V
Motherboard: Foxconn Blackops Quantum Force X48
GPU: MSI GTX-280 650MHz/2300MHz, 177.39 Beta
RAM: 2x2GB OCZ Reapers, DDR3-1770 8-8-8-27-1T
Case: Danger Den Torture Rack
Sound: Onboard
Cooling: Swiftech H20-220 Compact
Hard Drives: 1x500GB Seagate Barracuda
2x150GB Raptor X
PSU: Corsair 1000HX

Synthetic Tests:

First up on our list of tests will be the synthetic benchmarks.  In this category we will be using Futuremark's 3DMark06 and 3DMark Vantage.  First up, the 3DMark results:

In my mind, 3DMark06 is too antiquated to really be of use anymore, especially considering that it is run at 1280x1024.  As time goes on, it is just not going to scale like it used to.  But, I still run it because I know people will hoot and holler if I don't.  The 4870X2 takes down the 280 by a margin of  2,297 points, or a gain of 13%.

Next, we will take a look at 3DMark Vantage results.  First, however I must add a caveat.  The 177.39 beta drivers add PhysX support to the GTX-280, which inflates the CPU score by a good margin.  As such, I won't report the CPU test findings here, however, they do affect the total score, so keep this fact in mind.

First up from the Vantage testing is the "X" test.  The X preset runs graphics at the highest quality, and places the largest emphasis on GPU performance.  Thus, the X preset best represents the high end market.  The 4870X2 bests the 280 here as well, by 39% in the total score and 42% in the GPU test.  Pretty impressive.

The Vantage "H" and "P" presets represent more mid-range type of usage models.  Even still, the 4870X2 prevails in each test by at least 20%. 

Next Page >

Next Page > 




AMD
Cooler Master
Sapphire Tech
Futuremark Corp
Kingwin
Patriot Memory
Seagate