|
So how would the Toshiba DVD drive fare against a dedicated CD-ROM
drive? Koolcases sent along a Mitsumi 48x CD-ROM drive, model FX-4831 -
also with a black bezel. The drive carries the following features and
specifications;
► 95ms Random access seek time
► Ultra DMA and Multi-block transfers
► Double shell dust-sealed mechanism
► Multimedia MPC-3 compliant
► Multisession PHOTO-CD Support
► CD-ROM XA ready
Pretty much just
a standard CD-ROM reader. Press the one button located on the front of
the drive, insert your CD and the yellow LED will flicker and flash when
the drive is active. Other than a black bezel we're not buying CD-ROM
drives to look at them.

We need to know if its worth spending the
extra $25 to get the Toshiba DVD drive or stick it out with a dedicated
CD-ROM reader. We'll take the exact two CDs we had before and test the
Mitsumi in the same manor. Ultra DMA Mode 2 was verified enabled on the
IDE channel to which the Mitsumi was connected.

The
data stroke test comes out pretty even. The Start, End, and Average
speeds are almost identical on an integer level. The Random seek time of
92ms can (on a stretch) be called close to the Mitsumi claim of 85ms.
From there the seek times skyrocket, just as the Toshiba did. CPU usage
is a little odd. At 1x the drive hogs more cycles than at 4x and 8x! The
test was ran almost 4 times and each time the utilization rates were
almost identical. At 1x it simply uses more cycles. Hmm. The 1 Megabyte
burst rate is right on target.
The
following test will show the Digital Audio Extraction (DAE) capability
of the Mitsumi

The
only thing I can give kudos to the Mitsumi drive for is the CPU
utilization rate while performing DAE duties. Other than that, the
Toshiba DVD drive is clearly more suited to the task. The Mitsumi drive
starts and ends the DAE process at a much slower speed with a Burst rate
so low it can't be measured. While the 151ms seek time truly isn't
important during DEA the Toshiba shaved a full 50ms off the time.
So
when it comes time for you to choose a drive, the question remains as to
which functions are more important. Besides the obvious that the Toshiba
can read DVD-R and DVD-ROM discs, the Toshiba drive is also a little
better suited to handle Digital Audio Extraction. Plextor drives seem to
be the best i have seen so far at DAE tasks, most Plextor drives will
set you back at least $130 which is unacceptable for people building a
machine with a tight budget. If I were making the decision, I would go
with the Toshiba.
|