Reviews
Facebook
Links
Downloads
History
Contacts
Home
Best viewed with
IE8 or newer @
1024x768 or
larger. Copyright
© 1997-2012 by
Club Overclocker
All rights reserved.
Legal Stuff
   

AMD
Cooler Master
Sapphire Tech
Futuremark Corp
Kingwin
Patriot Memory
Seagate
 

Application:

A64 939 Motherboard

Provided by:

Soltek

Available at:

Newegg

MSRP:

$125

Availability:

Now

Review by:

Matt

Edited by:

Scott

Review date:

December 28th, 2004
   

Crucial System Scanner
 


Performance and Installation

     Installation was a breeze and nothing strange happened with our testbench setup. The OS install was very easy to do, and using F6 to install our Promise RAID array was uneventful. We do need to mention that you need to be very careful with the Soltek SATA cables. They have a 90 degree bend and proved to be difficult to remove once installed. We actually ended up breaking off the SATA header on one of our WD Raptors by accident. We do welcome the newer SATA cables, but you need to be careful!

     We had no problem with our install, and even the driver installation went smoothly with no BSOD's, lockup, and whatnot. What we've witnessed in previous 939 platforms were a lot of reboots, BSOD's and just general frustrating events, but with the Soltek everything went by smoothly. Once establishing a baseline from which to start our tests we noticed that the CPU temperature was extremely high. We were using the retail HSF that came with our 3500 Winchester, but for some reason the temps were higher than with other motherboards. At first we were uncertain if the problem was due to the motherboard misreading the CPU temp or if our heatsink just flat out sucked. A quick email to Soltek proved that they had their motherboard configured to use the 3500's built in sensor which would explain the high temps. Now we were confused because we had the impression that this was the way that all boards are. We decided to get a second opinion and started up Sandra 2005 to check. Sure enough Sandra was reporting temperatures much. At this point we said to hell with it and left it at that. If it makes you nervous to run your CPU at 80C as reported by Solteks hardware monitor, then just use Sandra for now until someone fixes the problem. Sandra reported it around 35C and the board ran flawlessly, so we decided to trust Sandra. If the 3500 blows up we'll update the review... Retail AMD processors are always recommended just for this reason!

Our setup was as follows:

Overclocking

     We tested our configuration using default and overclocked settings. For default we left our x800 Pro at the stock setting of 472mhz core and 450mhz memory speeds. During our overclocked benchmarks we used 585mhz core and 585mhz memory. The CPU was overclocked to 11x243 at 1.60vcore using memory timings of 2.5-3-3-7 at the Soltek's vddr setting of 2.8v. We were able to coax a tad bit more out of our processor but sometimes it was stable and other times it wasn't so we left it at a good general overclock which we thought was the best to benchmarks for. One thing to note that was very important is that we witnessed some real challenges in overclocking our Soltek board. The very first few hours we had it we nothing but frustration. After pulling our heads out of our #@$!#@ we found out that the HTT setting was still at 1000mhz which was giving us problems. As soon as we dropped this option down the board opened up like mad!

11x245 was pushin it, but we were able to coax a bit more out of it...

     This was about it. We were able to get it to 250fsb but not without dropping the multi down to 10X which we thought would yield slower benchmarks. 250fsb on this board was disappointing, until we saw the numbers being generated. The Soltek is the fastest motherboard we have ever tested to date.

Synthetic Benchmarks

SISoft Sandra Pro 2005

200fsb

Even at 200fsb the overall power of the AMD Athlon is always apparent.

The P4's will always pull ahead in Sandra's MMX test.

We cheated a little by running 2-2-2-5 with our PQI memory, but most good memory is made for PC-3200 2-2-2-5 timings

243fsb

Now we're talkin' We're in FX-55 territory now with our $250 CPU

Still not hitting dual P4 marks, but very close.. not bad for a single CPU.

This is at 2.5-3-3-7 timings at Soltek's 2.8vddr setting which is more like 2.7vddr. MORE VDDR PLEASE!

Futuremark's 3DMark Series

     A big thanks goes out to Futuremark for hooking us up with Pro versions of our favorite benchmarking suite "3DMark". With the latest v350 patch, 2003 seems to be a lot more accurate than it used to be, compared to when it first came out and was shunned from the hardware and benchmarking community.

Overclocked CPU-243x11 / Overclocked x800Pro-585-585 in red

Default CPU-200x11 / Default x800Pro-472-450 in purple

As you can see, the overclocking scales very well! The Soltek at 243x11 with a x800 pro seems to function quite well in our synthetic benchmarks.

Too much fun not to post this... There is life left in the K8T800 Pro chipset!

Feel free to compare our links on the ORB.