|

Testing
The system in today's tests will be a build
that starts with the new ASUS P6T Pro motherboard with the x58
chipset and the Intel Core i7 2.66GHz processor.
|
Hardware |
Model |
|
Motherboard: |
ASUS P6T Deluxe |
|
Motherboard BIOS Version: |
0804 |
|
CPU: |
Intel Core i7 2.66GHz |
|
Memory: |
Crucial 6GB DDR3 Triple Channel Kit
PN: CT3KIT25672BA1339 |
|
Video Card: |
Sapphire
HD 3870 1GB |
For today's testing I'll be sticking
with SiSoft Sandra 2009 SP2 (v2009.1.15.72).
My objective here is to show you the capabilities of this OCZ PC3
10666 3GB Triple Channel memory kit on the Core i7 platform. For stability testing
I'll be running Sandra Burn-In test for one hour at each setting
before the benchmark is accomplished.
Dual
and Triple Channel Tests
The first set of tests I want to
perform is to test the memory in single, dual and then triple
channel modes. This will give us an idea of what kind of performance
we can expect when using one, two, or all three memory channels.
Dual Channel Test
DDR3-1333MHz
Latency Settings: 7-7-7-20-1T
Voltage: 1.65v
| Int Memory
Bandwidth |
Float
Memory Bandwidth |
| 16,502 MB/s |
16,686 MB/s |
Triple Channel Test
DDR3-1333MHz
Latency Settings: 7-7-7-20-1T
Voltage: 1.65v
| Int Memory
Bandwidth |
Float
Memory Bandwidth |
| 21,449 MB/s |
21,416 MB/s |

From the numbers above, we can see that with Triple Channel we are
achieving a 130%
increase over Dual Channel when using the ASUS P6T Dlx motherboard.
No matter how you look at it, a 130% increase in any type of
performance is extremely impressive.
Memory Timings Tests
So far we can see that i7 and Triple Channel technology has some
incredible bandwidth compared to dual channel. Now let's test the stability of
OCZ's Triple Channel kit by lowering the memory timings.
| Latency Timings |
Voltage |
DDR3 Speed |
PASS/FAIL |
Int Memory Bandwidth |
| 7-7-7-20-1T (default) |
1.65v |
1333MHz |
PASS |
21,449 MB/s |
| 6-6-6-20-1T |
1.65v |
1333MHz |
FAIL |
- |
| 7-7-7-18-1T |
1.65v |
1333MHz |
PASS |
21,491 MB/s |
| 7-7-7-16-1T |
1.65v |
1333MHz |
PASS |
21,598 MB/s |
| 7-7-7-15-1T |
1.65v |
1333MHz |
FAIL |
- |
The latency timings tests were good, but not great. At
the default DDR3 speed of 1333MHz, timings of 7-7-7-18 is about all
you should expect. At 1.65v, there really isn't much room for
latency tweaking. I was able to drop the TRAS down to 16, but the
performance increase is minimal.
Voltage Tests
| Latency Timings |
Voltage |
DDR3 Speed |
PASS/FAIL |
| 7-7-7-20-1T (default) |
1.5v |
1333MHz |
PASS |
| 6-6-6-20-1T |
1.5v |
1333MHz |
FAIL |
| 7-7-7-18-1T |
1.5v |
1333MHz |
PASS |
| 7-7-7-16-1T |
1.5v |
1333MHz |
FAIL |
The voltage tests were fairly impressive. With our particular
configuration, we found that the full 1.65 volts isn't even
necessary as the system ran 100% stable with the memory voltage set
to 1.5 volts. We were even able to tighten the TRAS timing down to
18 without any problems.
On another note, while looking at the programmed timings table
through CPU-Z, the recommended memory voltage at 1333MHz DDR3 is
actually 1.5v. In this case, the required memory voltage is only 1.5
volts at default settings. My take on the 1.65v in the memory specs
is that OCZ is saying not to exceed 1.65 volts, the same as Intel's
warning.
Overclocking
Next we set the timings back down to default and then ramp up the
DDR3 bus speed. Take a look...
| Latency Timings |
Voltage |
DDR3 Speed |
PASS/FAIL |
Int Memory Bandwidth |
| 7-7-7-20-1T (default) |
1.65v |
1333MHz |
PASS |
21,449 MB/s |
| 7-7-7-20-1T (default) |
1.65v |
1600MHz |
PASS |
25,149 MB/s |
| 7-7-7-20-1T (default) |
1.65v |
1866MHz |
FAIL |
- |
| 8-8-8-24-1T |
1.65v |
1866MHz |
PASS |
27,374 MB/s |
| 9-9-9-24-1T |
1.65v |
2133 MHz |
FAIL |
- |
The overclocking tests were far more impressive than the
latency timings tests. I was able to easily achieve 1866MHz at
8-8-8-24-1T, with SiSoft Sandra showing an impressive memory bandwidth performance increase.

Conclusion
OCZ has a nice, inexpensive Triple Chanel memory kit for the Intel
Core i7 platform here. The performance is good, the memory is
stable, and there is some nice overclocking headroom. All that for
about $130 at NewEgg. The Intel Core i7 platform ceases to amaze me.
Every time I think I've reached the overclocking limits of my
hardware, I simply tweak a few settings and I'm able to push it even
further.
Although this OCZ PC3-10666 Platinum series kit isn't the fastest
triple channel kit we've tested, or are currently testing, it is one
of the least expensive. Therefore this kit is at the top of our list
for giving the consumer more bang for the buck. Kudos to OCZ for
giving us overclockers a great way to get into a Core i7 upgraded
without breaking the bank. Club Overclocker recommended!
|
 |
| Performance: |
3 out of 5 | |
Innovation: |
4 out of 5 | |
Quality: |
5 out of 5 | |
Stability: |
5 out of 5 |
| Aesthetics: |
5 out of 5 | |
Software/Drivers Pack: |
N/A |
|
Overclocking: |
4 out of 5 |
|
Value: |
5 out of 5 |
|
 |
 |
 | |
 | Project Skill Level (5 being most difficult) | 3
out of 5 |

|