|
Seagate
Barracuda ES.2
1 Terabyte SATA Enterprise Level Hard Drive
2x Hard Drive Test (RAID 0)
Hard Drive Tach - 8Mb Zones

|
Burst Speed: |
154.3 MB/s |
|
Average Read: |
114.7 MB/s |
|
Average Write: |
62.0 MB/s |
Here is
where we combine the hard drives to form a RAID 0 Array for
performance and drive space purposes only. With 64Kb stripe size, the
overall performance of the hard drives increase dramatically
compared to a single hard drive only. However, we again see a drop
in the average write speed when compared to the Barracuda 7200.11
(see conclusion).
In fact, when in RAID 0, the average write speed of 8Mb zones is
about the same as the Barracuda ES.2 in single drive configuration.
I'm very puzzled to why this is because did not find this problem in
Seagate's Barracuda 7200.11 desktop series of hard drives.
2x Hard Drive Test (RAID 0)
Hard Drive Tach - 32Mb Zones

|
Burst Speed: |
156.1 MB/s |
|
Average Read: |
114.2 MB/s |
|
Average Write: |
101.7 MB/s |
Once again
the lag in performance we've seen in 8Mb zones disappears when
testing the drive in 32Mb zones. The performance of the hard drives
in RAID 0 is very impressive and even blows away the Seagate
Barracuda 7200.11 1Tb hard drives when it comes to burst speed
(see conclusion).
2x Hard Drive Test (RAID 0)
HD
Tune: Read Only

|
Minimum Transfer Rate: |
84.9 MB/sec |
|
Maximum Transfer Rate: |
108.0 MB/sec |
|
Average Transfer Rate: |
105.4 MB/sec |
|
Access Time: |
10.5 ms |
|
Burst Rate: |
61.8 MB/sec |
|
CPU Usage: |
6.3% |
As for HD Tune, we
are showing very comparable RAID 0 performance when comparing to the
7200.11 drives in RAID 0. HD Tune is even showing a noticeable
performance increase in the "minimum" transfer rate over the 7200.11.
ES.2 vs. 7200.11 & Conclusion
I know what you are
thinking, how is it fair to compare a performance desktop hard drive
to a enterprise level hard drive? The way I see it, I'm looking for
performance and durability...and the Barracuda ES.2 delivers it all.
Let's recap...
When comparing the ES.2 to the 7200.11 in single
hard drive performance, both are neck and neck. You could even argue
that if you run the benchmarks enough times, the average scores
would show both drives even performers. To be honest, I find this to
be quite impressive. I really expected the 7200.11 to outperform the
ES.2 in every area.
When comparing the ES.2 to the 7200.11 in RAID 0
configuration, things start to change a little bit. First of all the
burst rate goes through the roof! But then the average read and
write scores suffer a small hit. I can only imagine that this small
drop in performance is due to Seagate's PowerTrim technology built
into the Barracuda ES.2 series hard drives that is designed to
selectively turn off unneeded functions during a
given read/write/random/sequential cycle in order to save power. So
over the time it takes to run a hard drive benchmark, the hard drive
is actually trying to conserve power.
Overall, I'm very impressed by
Seagate's new Barracuda ES.2 hard drives. For any enterprise level
hard drive to deliver the performance of a high end desktop hard
drive is quite impressive. As for price, Seagate has these babies
priced extremely competitively, especially if you dare try to
compare these to the Cheetah SCSI hard drives. A typical Seagate
Cheetah 15K5 with only 300 Gigabytes of space will run you about
$700. So to be able to pick up an ES.2 hard drive with 1000
Gigabytes of space for only $350 is a steal! I can't prove that the
ES.2 will outlast a typical desktop hard drive, but with Seagate
standing behind these hard drives for 5 years, I'm more than willing
to trust Seagate on this. Club Overclocker Recommended!
Note: Club Overclocker is
now using a new rating system based on a score of 1 to 5.
Please go to our rating system page for more information.
|
 |
| Performance: |
5 out of 5 | Innovation: |
5 out of 5 | Quality: |
5 out of 5 | Stability: |
5 out of 5 |
| Aesthetics: |
4 out of 5 | Software/Drivers Pack: |
N/A |
Overclocking: |
N/A |
|
Value: |
5 out of 5 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 | Project Skill Level (5 being most difficult) |
3
out of 5 |

|