|
Antec Performance CPU
Cooler Review
Features:
- Lightweight
copper heatpipe and aluminum fin
hybrid design
- Ball bearing
fan for extended life.
- Performance
is compatible with:
– Intel® socket 478 Celeron®,
Celeron® D, Celeron® M, Pentium® &
Pentium® M
– AMD socket 754, 939 & 940 Sempron™,
Turion™, Opteron™, Athlon™64 & 64FX
- Air Flow 30
CFM
- Acoustic
Noise 34.9 dBA (max)
Specifications:
- Overall
dimensions:
AMD: 100 x 80 x 74 mm
Intel: 72.5 x 78.5 x 74 mm
- Heatsink
Dimentions: 45 x 80 x 74 mm
- Net weight:
AMD: ~297g
Intel: ~291g
- Thermal
Resistance: 0.26º C/W
- Fan Size: 70
x 70 x 15 mm
- Fan Speed:
3800 RPM
- Air Flow 30
CFM
- Acoustic
Noise 34.9 dBA (max)
- Static
Pressure: 0.138 inch-H2O
- Voltage &
Current 12V / 030A /3.6W
The Competition:

Since my AMD box is currently
running an AeroCool GT1000 cooler, I will be comparing the Antec unit to
both the GT1000 and my OEM cooler. The GT1000 is a much more expensive
unit so I expect the CPU Cooler to weigh in between the two. The size
difference is also noticeable.

With the GT1000 installation, my
motherboard almost looks like the accessory not the other way around.
This thing is definitely overkill for my AMD Athlon 64 3000+.

In stark contrast the Performance
CPU Cooler is only slightly taller than the OEM heatsink. Because only
two screws attach the heatsink it is important to alternate tightening
them to prevent damaging your CPU. And don't forget the goop!

The resulting skyline is simple but
effective. Antec blends the advantages of heat pipe technology with the
limited space so many motherboards force onto us with capacitors and
other components placed closely around the socket.

The simple mounting can be clearly
seen here. The included 70 mm fan moves a solid 30 CFM and maxes out at
about 35 dBA. This ASUS A8N-SLI Deluxe motherboard is pretty
representative of the spacing found on most Socket 939 boards.

Here is the completed install as
showcased in our
Titan
550 review. Shiny! The rest of the build features a
2 Gb OCZ Gold
Edition GX XTC kit, and a
Gigabyte X1800XL.
The Titan 550 contains a set of 30 Gb drives from both Maxtor and
Western Digital and a NEC 3500A DVD burner. Cooling was assisted only
by the power supply and the visible 120 mm fan. Many heat pipe
solutions can be run without the added fan, that option was not
presented with the Performance CPU Cooler so all testing was performed
in the stock configuration. All testing was performed using a
Centech laser thermometer.

This chart shows the temperatures
as recorded from the center of the heat sink. The ambient room
temperature was 72 degrees and confirmed at the 120 mm exhaust fan to
match. The Titan 550 case is larger than a standard gaming case and
with the single OEM 120 mm fan it runs slightly higher than ambient even
while idling.

This chart shows the CPU core
temperatures both at idle and at load. These temperatures were
confirmed using Hardware Monitor
V4.2.4.2. Here we can really see the advantages over your
stock cooler. Both under idle and at load the Antec Performance CPU
Cooler provides a measurable advantage over the OEM cooler.
Surprisingly the numbers also hit pretty close to the GT-1000 weighing
in at over twice the cost!
Conclusion:
As expected the Antec cooler
outperforms the OEM solution by a noticeable amount in every test.
Antec's goal of providing an affordable alternative to the throw away
OEM cooling solution is a success. With a price point of about $20 you
have absolutely no good excuse to use an OEM cooler. Even against the
expensive GT-1000 cooler the Antec posts numbers that are more than
adequate for any of the supported CPU sockets. Looking for a
performance boost that won't break your budget, the Antec Performance
CPU cooler proves a small investment in cooling can yield big results.
Lowest Price:
$19.99 at Radio Shack
|
Club
Overclocker Rating |
|
Innovation: |
8.0
out of 10 |
|
Performance: |
7.0 out of 10 |
|
Quality: |
9.0 out of 10 |
|
Stability: |
N/A |
|
Overclocking: |
N/A |
|
Software/Drivers Pack: |
N/A |
|
Value: |
9.5 out of 10 |
|
Overall Rating
8.5 |
|
|
|
|
Skill Level |
|
Project Skill Level
(10 being hardest) |
4
out of 10 |
|